Austerity Now
Posted by Chris Maisano on 1/26/10 • Categorized as Domestic
CHRIS MAISANO
A couple months ago, I wrote a post titled The Coming Liberal Austerity Program. Well, it’s not just coming anymore. It’s here.
In response to the Republican victory in last week’s special election in Massachusetts and the deficit paranoia that has gripped the right wing and orthodox economists, President Obama announced yesterday that he will pursue a three year spending freeze in domestic discretionary federal spending, excluding of course “security-related” spending on the military even though it accounts for over 50% of all discretionary spending. We have to “fund the troops,” after all. Those of you with long memories may recall that candidate Obama appropriately rejected John McCain’s profoundly stupid call for a spending freeze during the 2008 campaign, but then again this administration doesn’t seem willing to make good on campaign promises that don’t involve placating bankers or dropping more bombs on people in the Middle East.
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are also excluded from cuts, but as an anonymous administration official noted, “by helping to create a new atmosphere of fiscal discipline, it can actually also feed into debates over other components of the budget.” The long-term implications of this statement are obvious, and disturbing. After cutting education, nutrition, national parks, and God knows what else (but probably not the military), the plan is to move against those nasty “entitlement” programs that the political class and the right hate so much. It took a Democrat to destroy welfare, and it seems as if another Democrat is preparing the groundwork for a final offensive against the New Deal. And to think that just last year, the media had crowned BHO as the new FDR. Psyche!
But most troubling in the shorter term is the possibility that this freeze may also apply to federal aid to state and local governments, which to date has prevented the recession from turning into a full-blown depression. The early reports in the press are not clear on this point (if anyone has some more information on this, please share it). The fiscal assistance that states received from Washington under President Obama’s stimulus package is scheduled to end on December 31, 2010. In the absence of further relief, states would be forced to make painful budget cuts that the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates “will take nearly a full percentage point off the Gross Domestic Product” and “cost the economy 900,000 jobs” on top of the millions of jobs that have already been lost during the course of the recession. I don’t want to see what kind of social catastrophe would result from the implosion of state and local governments across the country. The thought that this could potentially happen, and soon, is chilling.
As Paul Krugman said on his blog, “this looks like pure disaster,” not just economically but politically as well. You can bet that Republicans and “moderates” will just keep calling for more cuts, while the Democratic base drifts further into demoralization. I can’t see how a move toward austerity will significantly help the Democrats’ electoral chances this fall. If anything, it will provide further encouragement to Democratic voters to stay home. Ideologically, it provides validation for the conservative economic paradigm at a time when the last shovelfuls of dirt should be falling on its grave.
So after one year of the Obama administration, the picture is clear. If you are Wall Street, the military, the health insurance or pharmaceutical industries, a conservative Democrat, or even a Republican, the administration will bend over backwards to accommodate you. Everyone else gets a kick in the teeth. One can only hope that at least some of the millions who supported Obama and are becoming disillusioned with his administration will become radicalized in some fashion. If not, this country’s politics is likely to become even uglier than it already is.




If I can put on my cynical political strategist’s hat for a second here…
This sort of program seems in-line with the sort of Democrats that get elected in the swing states he’s in the most danger of losing. Mark Warner was a Democratic governor here in Virginia who “restored fiscal responsibility” while also cutting back college aid and causing many students receiving substantial aid for universities to have to borrow for their final year or two of school. Evan Bayh proposed this exact thing last week. It’s as if the only thing influencing this is getting just enough electoral votes from a couple of purple states to win it all in 2012, all while playing coy about “being a one-term president”. Come on. If he wasn’t running in 2012, he’d have no reason to go so far out of his way to please conservatives with this and to please pharma, banks, even organized labor with transparent pandering that accomplishes nothing of value to working people.
To be honest, I give up on trying to figure Obama out. I really wish there was a real alternative to having just a two party system in this country.
On one hand you have a party of evil holier than thou morons, while on the other hand you have barely capable of getting anything done despite having a 60 -40 majority party of buffoons.
Dem support is dropping not because they are too liberal and progressive. Its because they are not liberal and progressive enough! No real support for labor, no health care, no funding for parks, no funding for education…
Almost everything we voted this guy into to office to do he is not doing and to make things worse doing the opposite.
I would almost have McCain remorse if it weren’t for his nut job running mate.
Severely Disillusioned,
R
Rob, it’s not so much that the Dems are buffoons or lack spine or something like that. It’s just that like the Republicans they are a party of capital, but their need to pursue the interests of capital comes into conflict with the fact that labor and liberals (and some radicals) have set up shop in the party as well. But more often than not, the more conservative, capital oriented factions win out in terms of policy. That’s what we’re seeing now. The fact that there isn’t a significant extraparliamentary left to exercise some pressure on the party doesn’t help either.